The familiar chant of 'no' reverberates in my mind from
Sunday afternoon. Once a month, I volunteer with a self defense coursed
tailored specifically for women that is run by Edmonton police officer members.
Self defense courses gives women the opportunity to choose
whether or not they want to fight back, rather than inevitably falling into the
victim role from a lack of knowledge or skill. Self defense, according to
Cahill, "transform[s] the feminine body from an enemy into an ally"
(372) changing how women see and respond to their bodies. While important
critiques have been made against self defense, citing its shift of blame from
the perpetrator to the victim to stop the assault, having your body on your
side can be very empowering, especially in a context where women's bodies are
consistently under another's control. The cultural context that has allowed
rape to occur continues to exist today so women should discover and rediscover
their body and minds' capabilities until we live in a rape free world.
The gym's echoes of pads being hit by punches women never
thought they could throw interrupts the rape script and how women identify with
it. Offenders typically choose their victims based on the assumption they won't
fight back, so the act of fighting back itself can be enough to end the
assault. Obviously this is not always the case, and there is a very real possibility
for this to end with the opposite of the desired effect. Self defense courses for
women do, however, use "those differences to enhance women's physical
power" (377). For example, the popular quip of punching like a girl can be
debunked by employing methods like using one's hips instead of upper body to
put power behind the punch.
There are a number of intersecting setbacks to self defense.
Speaking anecdotally, despite having the physical skill to defend myself, I
still lack the mindset to utilize it in life outside the course. I don't want
to make a scene about an ass grab, something so seemingly trivial, for fear of
being labeled as a hysterical, over reactive bitch. "Self defense training
does hold the potential to undermine some of the most crucial and embodied
tenets of a rape culture" (378)but only if one is willing to enter a
situation as an actor of violence, unchartered territory for many women. Knowledge
also does not always transition neatly into practice because knowing how to
break someone's nose is very different from believing you're worth breaking someone's
nose over. Additionally, there exists a strange fear of rejection in acting in
self defense if the perpetrator doesn't take you seriously as a threat because
"contemporary gendering practices do not encourage, facilitate, or make
likely this kind of response" (376).
If gender inequality, not the individual female body, is
emphasized for the root of rape, self defense "[articulates] possibilities
for constructive, effective ways of undoing the norms of a rape culture [and]
is not the same as demanding that women take responsibility for keeping
themselves safe" (374).
Works Cited
Cahill, Ann J.
"In Defense of Self-Defense." Philosophical Papers 38.3
(2009): 363-80. <http://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=hlh&AN=53467089&site=eds-live&scope=site
No comments:
Post a Comment